©2024 Phil Wieland
|
Train Service Performance at Huyton - May 2016
Date | Scheduled | Trains Run | On Time | Within 5 min. | Comments |
Sunday 01 | 62 | 62 | (100.0%) | 55 | (88.7%) | 59 | (95.1%) | |
Monday 02 | 162 | 162 | (100.0%) | 152 | (93.8%) | 160 | (98.7%) | |
Tuesday 03 | 163 | 163 | (100.0%) | 145 | (88.9%) | 156 | (95.7%) | |
Wednesday 04 | 162 | 154 | (95.0%) | 125 | (77.1%) | 142 | (87.6%) | A broken down train at Patricroft resulted in some cancellations and delays between 07:00 and 11:00. |
Thursday 05 | 172 | 154 | (89.5%) | 94 | (54.6%) | 108 | (62.7%) | A signalling failure at Huyton caused major delays, diversions and cancellations from 15:30 until 21:30. |
Friday 06 | 162 | 162 | (100.0%) | 146 | (90.1%) | 161 | (99.3%) | |
Saturday 07 | 163 | 161 | (98.7%) | 143 | (87.7%) | 155 | (95.0%) | |
Sunday 08 | 62 | 62 | (100.0%) | 54 | (87.0%) | 59 | (95.1%) | |
Monday 09 | 160 | 159 | (99.3%) | 141 | (88.1%) | 152 | (95.0%) | |
Tuesday 10 | 160 | 159 | (99.3%) | 131 | (81.8%) | 145 | (90.6%) | |
Wednesday 11 | 161 | 156 | (96.8%) | 136 | (84.4%) | 149 | (92.5%) | Delays and cancellations between 11:45 and 14:00 were due to an incident at Thatto Heath, believed to be a person struck by a train. |
Thursday 12 | 160 | 160 | (100.0%) | 142 | (88.7%) | 154 | (96.2%) | |
Friday 13 | 162 | 162 | (100.0%) | 144 | (88.8%) | 159 | (98.1%) | |
Saturday 14 | 163 | 163 | (100.0%) | 138 | (84.6%) | 153 | (93.8%) | |
Sunday 15 | 62 | 62 | (100.0%) | 56 | (90.3%) | 60 | (96.7%) | |
Monday 16 | 161 | 161 | (100.0%) | 154 | (95.6%) | 160 | (99.3%) | |
Tuesday 17 | 161 | 161 | (100.0%) | 155 | (96.2%) | 160 | (99.3%) | |
Wednesday 18 | 161 | 161 | (100.0%) | 144 | (89.4%) | 159 | (98.7%) | |
Thursday 19 | 161 | 161 | (100.0%) | 151 | (93.7%) | 159 | (98.7%) | |
Friday 20 | 162 | 162 | (100.0%) | 148 | (91.3%) | 160 | (98.7%) | |
Saturday 21 | 163 | 160 | (98.1%) | 146 | (89.5%) | 153 | (93.8%) | |
Sunday 22 | 62 | 62 | (100.0%) | 59 | (95.1%) | 61 | (98.3%) | |
Monday 23 | 162 | 161 | (99.3%) | 142 | (87.6%) | 152 | (93.8%) | |
Tuesday 24 | 162 | 161 | (99.3%) | 147 | (90.7%) | 157 | (96.9%) | |
Wednesday 25 | 162 | 161 | (99.3%) | 149 | (91.9%) | 156 | (96.2%) | |
Thursday 26 | 162 | 162 | (100.0%) | 149 | (91.9%) | 158 | (97.5%) | |
Friday 27 | 162 | 161 | (99.3%) | 145 | (89.5%) | 158 | (97.5%) | |
Saturday 28 | 163 | 162 | (99.3%) | 131 | (80.3%) | 145 | (88.9%) | |
Sunday 29 | 62 | 62 | (100.0%) | 50 | (80.6%) | 57 | (91.9%) | |
Monday 30 | 162 | 154 | (95.0%) | 139 | (85.8%) | 151 | (93.2%) | |
Tuesday 31 | 162 | 161 | (99.3%) | 130 | (80.2%) | 147 | (90.7%) | |
Month | 4526 | 4474 | (98.8%) | 3993 | (88.2%) | 4317 | (95.3%) | |
Notes
- The figures are derived from information of Network Rail Infrastructure Limited licensed under this licence.
- Trains cancelled by planned engineering works are not counted as a cancellation. (As long as they are removed from the timetable.)
- Rail replacement buses are not counted, since running information is not available.
- Trains running within two minutes of correct time are deemed to be on time. I also show trains within five minutes, the railway's standard.
|